| 1 |
Dňa Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:34:19 +0100 |
| 2 |
Bryan Østergaard <kloeri@g.o> napísal: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Anyway, here's several reasons why it's lame - I'm sure there's even |
| 5 |
> more good reasons but these should suffer: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Another reason would be that it would cripple (even more) the benefit |
| 8 |
of having all the relevant info in one place - the ebuild. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Currently, everything is in the ebuild, except package.masks, which are |
| 11 |
in profiles. What OP is proposing would increase number of places to |
| 12 |
look for info from two to two plus number of supported archs. Not good. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Please don't "improve" the current way of defining keywords just because |
| 15 |
some people got scary CVS conflict messages. Those happen all the time |
| 16 |
in larger repositories. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Kind regards, |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andrej Kacian <ticho at gentoo org> |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 |
Archives