Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Philip Webb <purslow@×××××××××.ca>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:46:59
Message-Id: 20070607164338.GB4924@sympatico.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML by "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh"
1 070607 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
2 > people with ability to say "move this to gentoo-politics or else.."
3 > for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failing to use logic
4 > in your technical discussion or else..." with power
5 > to temporarily ban people for non-compliance could be a useful thing.
6
7 I've also previously thought a 'gentoo-pol' list wb an improvement,
8 leaving 'gentoo-dev' for genuine development discussions & announcements.
9 The former should have fairly free speech, but some users/devs might choose
10 not to subscribe, if the noise tended to outweigh the messages.
11 Its principal attraction wb to relieve '-dev', as you describe.
12
13 --
14 ========================,,============================================
15 SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@××××××××××××××.ca
16 ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
17 TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list