1 |
...and recombining again.. |
2 |
|
3 |
On 2011-10-17, at 1:24 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On 10/17/2011 09:02 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
6 |
>> Splitting this up since i'm kind of starting two threads here.. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> ----- Documentation discussion ----- |
9 |
>> On 16/10/11 02:44 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> Well, you'll have to define the meaning of "support" in this context. I |
12 |
>>> simply said that it shouldn't be encouraged, with me reason being that |
13 |
>>> it tends to add unnecessary complexity (in violation of the KISS |
14 |
>>> principle [1]). |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I would agree with this (that it shouldn't be encouraged), but I don't |
18 |
>> think the Handbook is encouraging it now, as it is written.. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It depends on how you define "encouraging" in this context. The fact |
21 |
> that /usr is shown as a separate partition might be considered |
22 |
> "suggestive" if not "encouraging". If a user takes that suggestion |
23 |
> without knowing the consequences (special initramfs or linuxrc init |
24 |
> wrapper configuration), then then it could cause some disappointment |
25 |
> when they finally discover the consequences. |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> ----- Support/implementation discussion ----- |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>>> ... If people want that, I think it's perfectly |
30 |
>>> reasonable to expect them to use either an initramfs or a simple linuxrc |
31 |
>>> approach [2] to ensure that /usr is mounted before init starts. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> ...this would make sense, although in terms of "support" i think it |
34 |
>> would be appropriate that we would provide this linuxrc wrapper on any |
35 |
>> init system that needs /usr mounted. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> If someone wants to take on the burden of maintaining an init wrapper |
38 |
> like that, then I guess that's fine. However, I wouldn't consider it to |
39 |
> be an absolute requirement. I think it would be fine (maybe preferable) |
40 |
> to simply provide a doc that describes how to mount /usr via an |
41 |
> initramfs or linuxrc init wrapper. Such a doc would only be needed by |
42 |
> those users who require that /usr be on a separate partition. |
43 |
|
44 |
This makes sense. So the Handbook could be updated with a caveat after the large partition example to say something like "/usr on it's own partition needs special consideration, please see XXXXX" ... this works. |