| 1 |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:46:35 +0000 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:41:45 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > How does this chord with eclasses that set EAPI, instead of ebuilds? |
| 7 |
> > Last I read was that EAPI-set-by-eclass was close to being ratified. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Read where? So far as I'm aware, everyone's been saying "don't set |
| 10 |
> EAPI in an eclass". |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On this mailing list, in the "EAPI placement" thread. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
JeR |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives