Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:49:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20071218044635.2f97f88d@blueyonder.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Jeroen Roovers |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:41:45 +0100 |
| 2 | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > How does this chord with eclasses that set EAPI, instead of ebuilds? |
| 4 | > Last I read was that EAPI-set-by-eclass was close to being ratified. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Read where? So far as I'm aware, everyone's been saying "don't set EAPI |
| 7 | in an eclass". |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |