Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:09:52
Message-Id: 20160527210939.GA12635@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:55:41PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
2 > On 5/27/16 1:44 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:14:17PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
4 > >> On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote:
5 > >>> On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell <blackwelllandis@×××××.com> wrote:
6 > >>>> I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016
7 > >>>
8 > >>> Good to know, thanks for stopping by.
9 > >>>
10 > >>
11 > >> Yeah the "its <current> year" meme has been making its rounds of the
12 > >> internet.
13 > >>
14 > >> anyhow, my 2017 question is about avahi. right now i have USE=gtk and
15 > >> gtk3, where gtk really means gtk2. i'm not going to change that because
16 > >> it fits QA's specs. but i could remove it altogether and just drop gtk2
17 > >> support for the next release. good idea? bad idea? i guess i'm asking
18 > >> whats the status of gtk2 in gentoo seeing as its dead upstream.
19 > >
20 > > From QA's pov, the gtk2 support is up to you, but I also would recommend
21 > > adding a gtk2 use flag if you keep it around. The idea is to eventually
22 > > get away from the non-versioned use flag.
23 >
24 > It wouldn't be adding, it would be renaming a flag which is possible but
25 > annoying. Anyhow I'll cross that bridge after the next release of avahi.
26
27 Ok, I did mis-speak a bit here. You can keep the gtk use flag, but it
28 refers to gtk2 only.
29
30 The gtk3 use flag should be used for gtk3.
31
32 Thanks,
33
34 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature