| 1 |
On 5/27/16 1:44 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:14:17PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell <blackwelllandis@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> Good to know, thanks for stopping by. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Yeah the "its <current> year" meme has been making its rounds of the |
| 11 |
>> internet. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> anyhow, my 2017 question is about avahi. right now i have USE=gtk and |
| 14 |
>> gtk3, where gtk really means gtk2. i'm not going to change that because |
| 15 |
>> it fits QA's specs. but i could remove it altogether and just drop gtk2 |
| 16 |
>> support for the next release. good idea? bad idea? i guess i'm asking |
| 17 |
>> whats the status of gtk2 in gentoo seeing as its dead upstream. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> From QA's pov, the gtk2 support is up to you, but I also would recommend |
| 20 |
> adding a gtk2 use flag if you keep it around. The idea is to eventually |
| 21 |
> get away from the non-versioned use flag. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It wouldn't be adding, it would be renaming a flag which is possible but |
| 24 |
annoying. Anyhow I'll cross that bridge after the next release of avahi. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Thanks, |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> William |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 36 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 37 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 38 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives