| 1 |
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 19:23:23 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| As R Hill already pointed out, WONTFIX means that the *bug* will never |
| 4 |
| be fixed. Fixing the *ebuild* would fix the bug, so WONTFIX isn't the |
| 5 |
| right keyword. Following your logic, all bugs dealing with ebuild |
| 6 |
| should be marked WONTFIX; in the ebuild's current state the bug wont |
| 7 |
| be fixed. Its just not a logical argument. |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
| What Ciaran is actually doing is assigning the bug back to the person |
| 10 |
| that submitted the ebuild. So ASSIGNED or something new like |
| 11 |
| CONTRIB_ASSIGNED would be appropriate. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
*shrug* If you can persuade Jeff to deal with the pain of adding |
| 14 |
another bugzilla resolution (which is nowhere near as easy as adding |
| 15 |
keywords) I'll use it. But really, WONTFIX is just fine. As the bug |
| 16 |
stands, it won't be fixed. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 20 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 21 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives