| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:00:02PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>WONTFIX refers to the bug, not the attached ebuild. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> And it won't be 'fixed' unless the ebuild is improved, so WONTFIX is |
| 10 |
> fine. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
As R Hill already pointed out, WONTFIX means that the *bug* will never |
| 14 |
be fixed. Fixing the *ebuild* would fix the bug, so WONTFIX isn't the |
| 15 |
right keyword. Following your logic, all bugs dealing with ebuild should |
| 16 |
be marked WONTFIX; in the ebuild's current state the bug wont be fixed. |
| 17 |
Its just not a logical argument. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
What Ciaran is actually doing is assigning the bug back to the person |
| 20 |
that submitted the ebuild. So ASSIGNED or something new like |
| 21 |
CONTRIB_ASSIGNED would be appropriate. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQFDB7tr2QTTR4CNEQARAnK8AJkB4ThPI0YmG3HUU15hvXuVmAC+bwCfT77o |
| 27 |
tNRu+Ol64fpUMoA1o33YZ7A= |
| 28 |
=Q0JO |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives