1 |
Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> As R Hill already pointed out, WONTFIX means that the *bug* will never |
4 |
> be fixed. Fixing the *ebuild* would fix the bug, so WONTFIX isn't the |
5 |
> right keyword. Following your logic, all bugs dealing with ebuild should |
6 |
> be marked WONTFIX; in the ebuild's current state the bug wont be fixed. |
7 |
> Its just not a logical argument. |
8 |
|
9 |
Given every dev is complaining about how long is getting this thread and |
10 |
how pointless is. |
11 |
|
12 |
PLEASE AVOID REFRAINING SUCH NONSENSE |
13 |
|
14 |
point taken, working on it, don't impair our productivity more than that. |
15 |
|
16 |
thank you |
17 |
|
18 |
lu |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
|
22 |
Luca Barbato |
23 |
|
24 |
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader |
25 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |