Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla handling for maintainer-wanted things
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:34:21
Message-Id: 4307BCE0.2050701@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla handling for maintainer-wanted things by "Nathan L. Adams"
1 Nathan L. Adams wrote:
2
3 > As R Hill already pointed out, WONTFIX means that the *bug* will never
4 > be fixed. Fixing the *ebuild* would fix the bug, so WONTFIX isn't the
5 > right keyword. Following your logic, all bugs dealing with ebuild should
6 > be marked WONTFIX; in the ebuild's current state the bug wont be fixed.
7 > Its just not a logical argument.
8
9 Given every dev is complaining about how long is getting this thread and
10 how pointless is.
11
12 PLEASE AVOID REFRAINING SUCH NONSENSE
13
14 point taken, working on it, don't impair our productivity more than that.
15
16 thank you
17
18 lu
19
20 --
21
22 Luca Barbato
23
24 Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
25 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla handling for maintainer-wanted things "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>