From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | ||
Date: | Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:52:32 | ||
Message-Id: | 20121118155127.GE83592@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by "Diego Elio Pettenò" |
1 | On 18-11-2012 07:42:40 -0800, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
2 | > Also, I doubt anybody would argue that it's not commutative (move to |
3 | > /usr, move to /) — it's just pragmatic, most stuff uses /usr anyway as |
4 | > base, so the move / -> /usr is infinitely less painful than /usr -> /. |
5 | |
6 | You end up with a symlink (e.g. bin -> ./usr/bin) from one place to the |
7 | other regardless, so it doesn't matter much. |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Fabian Groffen |
12 | Gentoo on a different level |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <mva@×××.name> |