Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:44:20
Message-Id: 50A901F0.1050201@flameeyes.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov"
1 On 18/11/2012 07:34, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
2 > To be honest, in my opinion, «killing of separate /usr» can reasonable
3 > be continued by moving all it's content to / (/usr/bin -> /bin, /usr/lib
4 > -> lib, and so on) in despite of all objections, as it was invented just
5 > because of disk space exhaustion.
6
7 Well, the objection to that was what actually "caused" this udev fork, so...
8
9 Also, I doubt anybody would argue that it's not commutative (move to
10 /usr, move to /) — it's just pragmatic, most stuff uses /usr anyway as
11 base, so the move / -> /usr is infinitely less painful than /usr -> /.
12
13 To me, I don't care. I haven't even used /boot in years.
14
15 --
16 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
17 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies