| 1 |
To be honest, in my opinion, «killing of separate /usr» can reasonable |
| 2 |
be continued by moving all it's content to / (/usr/bin -> /bin, /usr/lib |
| 3 |
-> lib, and so on) in despite of all objections, as it was invented just |
| 4 |
because of disk space exhaustion. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
18.11.2012 22:16, Samuli Suominen пишет: |
| 8 |
> On 18/11/12 17:04, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 9 |
>> On 18/11/2012 03:11, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> [Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think |
| 12 |
>>> that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are |
| 13 |
>>> on "non-SysD-related udev" side.] |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> The fact you're asking means you really haven't been following anything |
| 16 |
>> I've been doing lately. As many other developers can easily attest, I |
| 17 |
>> don't use systemd and I'm not planning to use it anytime soon. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> So your whole rant picking up on my post is completely misdirected. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Same here. I haven't even tried it and got no plans to. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I'm still happy enough with building udev out from systemd tree and |
| 24 |
> letting sep. /usr consept from 90s to finally die in favour of |
| 25 |
> simplifying the system. |
| 26 |
> The BIOSes have been upgraded last century to support booting from |
| 27 |
> larger partitions, the need has long past. |
| 28 |
> Nobody has ever provided a valid reason for using sep. /usr in the ML |
| 29 |
> either. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> - Samuli |
| 32 |
> |
Archives