Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:17:15
Message-Id: 50A8FBC2.200@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On 18/11/12 17:04, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > On 18/11/2012 03:11, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
3 >>
4 >> [Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think
5 >> that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are
6 >> on "non-SysD-related udev" side.]
7 >
8 > The fact you're asking means you really haven't been following anything
9 > I've been doing lately. As many other developers can easily attest, I
10 > don't use systemd and I'm not planning to use it anytime soon.
11 >
12 > So your whole rant picking up on my post is completely misdirected.
13
14 Same here. I haven't even tried it and got no plans to.
15
16 I'm still happy enough with building udev out from systemd tree and
17 letting sep. /usr consept from 90s to finally die in favour of
18 simplifying the system.
19 The BIOSes have been upgraded last century to support booting from
20 larger partitions, the need has long past.
21 Nobody has ever provided a valid reason for using sep. /usr in the ML
22 either.
23
24 - Samuli

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <mva@×××.name>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Tightly-coupled core distro "Steven J. Long" <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>