| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:54:11PM +0100, Geert Bevin wrote: |
| 2 |
: On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 13:18, Vitaly Kushneriuk wrote: |
| 3 |
: |
| 4 |
: The problem is that when I remove them now for the qmail-qstat to |
| 5 |
: function properly, an unmerge of a previously installed package might |
| 6 |
: remove important queue dirs which are need for qmail to function. When |
| 7 |
: having to chose between the two I tend to prefer having a properly |
| 8 |
: running qmail system in all cases than an incorrectly reported number by |
| 9 |
: qstat. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You know, qmail is the only MTA in the portage tree that does not |
| 12 |
rebuild it's queue structure automagically. Maybe we should look at |
| 13 |
making an ebuild for one of the "qmail-queue-fixer programs" and just |
| 14 |
have qmail-sumo (great name BTW) install that as well. Heck, we could |
| 15 |
even have it called from the init script -- so that it's seamless to the |
| 16 |
end user. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
For the record, I would prefer having the correct number of messages |
| 19 |
reported by qstat. Last thing we want to be is known as the distro that |
| 20 |
couldn't get qmail right. 8) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
--Jerry |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... |
| 25 |
...It's much more important than that! |
Archives