| 1 |
Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'd say that if around 7 people vote on the matter that that is |
| 3 |
> based on a necessary amount of understanding. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
That is just incredibly naïve. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
In another project five people reviewed an experimental change |
| 8 |
written by me that someone else proposed for inclusion into the |
| 9 |
project without my knowledge or consent. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Not a single person thought to communicate with me about the change |
| 12 |
and not a single person realized that there were enormous fundamental |
| 13 |
problems with the change. (Why *I* hadn't proposed it for inclusion.) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In history lessons you may have learned about majorities of populations |
| 16 |
supporting something the same individuals consider a pretty darn bad |
| 17 |
idea in hindsight, but which they were unable to decide on correctly |
| 18 |
at the time. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
You need to learn to respect what you don't know that you don't know. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
//Peter |
Archives