| 1 |
Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Could you spell out that exception clause, please? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> It doesn't translate well into words, but we'll go with something |
| 6 |
> like "Unless you know exactly why the rule is there, understand |
| 7 |
> fully the implications of breaking it, and know why it's a |
| 8 |
> good idea in this particular case." |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> However, if you're in a position to be invoking that clause, you |
| 11 |
> should know about it anyway. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Can we skip the sekrit rulez crap and just spell it out? Really, how |
| 14 |
does this help anyone? |
Archives