1 |
On Friday 04 May 2007 8:01:58 pm Dan Meltzer wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 04 May 2007 7:52:46 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, 4 May 2007 19:48:19 -0400 |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > > That seems like a really bad road to go down. |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > Would it not be better to extend elog to alert people at the end of |
9 |
> > > an install as well? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Doesn't help. It's only there once, and it's easy to ignore. Users |
12 |
> > don't have to explicitly mark it as read, so it's frequently not read. |
13 |
> > elog is not an adequate solution. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Emm, That would depend upon the viewer I'd think. elogs are saved in a |
16 |
> directory, and so the only way they would disappear is if the user chose to |
17 |
> delete them (or the viewer did it for them). |
18 |
|
19 |
Ooops, I guess they are only saved if it's explicity enabled, there goes that |
20 |
idea :/ |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> > > When I think of news I think of things that are |
24 |
> > > required to do or my system will break. That is what I want out of |
25 |
> > > news. I can't see how deprecated syntax fits that defination. The |
26 |
> > > program should warn when it finds deprecated syntax, and the users |
27 |
> > > will then know. Or if the users ignore it, then when the support is |
28 |
> > > removed and the package errors, the user fixes it then without any |
29 |
> > > major headache. It sure isn't something that will break a users |
30 |
> > > system utterly if its not acted upon. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > It's something that is of sufficient interest to those who will read |
33 |
> > the news item that a news item is warranted. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |