Archives
Archives
| From: | "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree | ||
| Date: | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:53:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070612104641.GE4738@ferdyx.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree by Richard Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:36:31AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 3 | > > Some of the packages I maintain are better removed when a new |
| 4 | > > maintenance version is released. And I plan to keep it that way :) |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Can you clarify this? What scenarios do you run into where it isn't good |
| 7 | > for stable users to have access to more than one version of the software? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Known to be buggy versions. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - ferdy |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín |
| 15 | 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree | cilly <cilly@××××××××××.nu> |