| 1 |
В Срд, 14/01/2009 в 20:24 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 11:05 Mon 12 Jan , AllenJB wrote: |
| 3 |
> > In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different |
| 4 |
> > purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for |
| 5 |
> > users. While the cvs log will likely just want to explain what change |
| 6 |
> > was made, the ChangeLog should explain why it was made. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> So if you want to know both, you need to look in 2 places? That doesn't |
| 9 |
> seem very nice to me. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
We do not distribute portage tree trough cvs and rsync does not have |
| 12 |
ChangeLog's. But even with cvs, cvs log is very slow ... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Also in a distributed VCS, we'd want to generate |
| 15 |
> ChangeLogs from the commit logs |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
True. But portage tree is still CVS and until this happened we need |
| 18 |
document all changes in ChangeLog's. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Peter. |
Archives