| 1 |
On 29-02-2008 08:12:34 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Bernd Steinhauser wrote: |
| 6 |
> |> Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced, |
| 7 |
> | Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such |
| 8 |
> | a setup.) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I would be interested as well, especially if based on FreeBSD-7. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That already happened, but probably not in the way you're looking for. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> | Wouldn't it be more clean if it is amd64 just like the Linux one? |
| 15 |
> | Because the arch basically is the same. I think that |
| 16 |
> | amd64(-linux) -- x86_64-fbsd |
| 17 |
> | x86(-linux) -- x86-fbsd |
| 18 |
> | |
| 19 |
> | would be more confusing than |
| 20 |
> | amd64(-linux) -- amd64-fbsd |
| 21 |
> | x86(-linux) -- x86-fbsd |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I agree, and vote for consistency as well. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yes, but as mentioned before, my problem is that amd64-macos really |
| 26 |
doesn't make any sense to me. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 30 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives