1 |
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 08:23 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide |
5 |
> > to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember |
6 |
> > their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the |
7 |
> > "package-by-package" proposal for others) |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Honestly, it is best if the arch teams take the initiative on these |
11 |
> sorts of things. They're in the best place to figure out what their |
12 |
> users' needs are. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The Council tends to get involved when the issue escalates to the |
15 |
> point where it becomes a burden on maintainers. It is always better |
16 |
> for the arch teams to manage their own problems. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> So, by all means put it on the Council agenda, but I'd strongly |
19 |
> encourage the ppc arch team to weigh in with their opinion - if we can |
20 |
> form a consensus on the list you don't even need the Council to vote. |
21 |
> Not that we mind - it is just better to solve things collaboratively. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Rich |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Sure, at least for ppc teams I guess we could get it discussed by the |
27 |
Council as blueness is in ppc teams per: |
28 |
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml#doc_chap89 |
29 |
|
30 |
Not sure about the other team members :/, I also see no one listed as |
31 |
lead: |
32 |
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/ppc/ |
33 |
|
34 |
For the other arch teams I guess I can start a new thread for them (in |
35 |
summary, pointing them to this thread for the idea but suggesting them |
36 |
to create the lists of packages to keep stable as they prefer). You are |
37 |
probably not seeing so much escalation because we end up relying on ago |
38 |
and zlogene to fix that... but that is not a long term solution. I am |
39 |
mostly thinking on ia64 and sparc. Alpha looks to have recently fixed |
40 |
lots of bugs (by klausman I think) and I am unsure about ARM as I guess |
41 |
his problem is different (it's due they needing to test on many |
42 |
different machines to get things stabilized, and that probably needs a |
43 |
different discussion before :/) |