| 1 |
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide |
| 4 |
> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember |
| 5 |
> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the |
| 6 |
> "package-by-package" proposal for others) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Honestly, it is best if the arch teams take the initiative on these |
| 10 |
sorts of things. They're in the best place to figure out what their |
| 11 |
users' needs are. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The Council tends to get involved when the issue escalates to the |
| 14 |
point where it becomes a burden on maintainers. It is always better |
| 15 |
for the arch teams to manage their own problems. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So, by all means put it on the Council agenda, but I'd strongly |
| 18 |
encourage the ppc arch team to weigh in with their opinion - if we can |
| 19 |
form a consensus on the list you don't even need the Council to vote. |
| 20 |
Not that we mind - it is just better to solve things collaboratively. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives