| 1 |
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100 |
| 2 |
Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > 8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No, current behaviour is undefined for not a file. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> > 14) EAPI 3 supports pkg_info on installed packages |
| 10 |
> you probably mean: uninstalled |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yup. The diff's right, just the commit message that's wrong. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > 15) USE is stricter in EAPI 3 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Proper documentation for IUSE_IMPLICIT/USE_EXPAND_IMPLICIT is needed. |
| 17 |
> In the PMS draft there's only a reference to section 11.1.1, but in |
| 18 |
> that section is nothing about it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'm still not sure a) whether we want those, b) how exactly they work |
| 21 |
or c) whether there's any chance at all of Portage supporting this in |
| 22 |
the time we're after. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> > 20) EAPI 3 has doexample. |
| 25 |
> Including "-r" or implicit recursive? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Nope. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives