1 |
Unfortunately, unless you offer them part of your hopeful $3billion, lawyers |
2 |
don't move very fast. There have been a few emails since then that have |
3 |
talked about NFP status. Afaik, it's progressing, but all the work is being |
4 |
done by Daniel (who has many other things going on as well), and his lawyer |
5 |
who is accepting very minimal pay (iirc). I'm sure it's not far off, and if |
6 |
it isn't, well that's life. Not to sound patronizing or anything, but this is |
7 |
a very large project to keep running, and to take care of business stuff, |
8 |
etc. is all a very big job. |
9 |
|
10 |
--Iggy |
11 |
|
12 |
On Monday 02 February 2004 09:02 pm, Stroller wrote: |
13 |
> On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:45 pm, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
14 |
> > This is an awesome GLEP idea, and I'm glad it finally got put into |
15 |
> > written |
16 |
> > words. The one suggestion I have, which I am sure is up for a large |
17 |
> > amount |
18 |
> > of criticism, is that I think Gentoo should charge a fee for the use |
19 |
> > of this |
20 |
> > tree. This is, in my opinion, a premium service, and a I believe it |
21 |
> > should |
22 |
> > come with a premium price, even if it's as low as 5 dollars per |
23 |
> > quarter. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I hate to nag about this, or seem antagonistic, but it's now 7 months |
26 |
> since the Zygot "fork" and controversy. drobbins made several |
27 |
> statements during June / July / August of last year that suggested |
28 |
> Gentoo would be pursuing a not-for-profit status, however in the last 6 |
29 |
> months no evidence of legal moves to formalise this has been presented. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I'll just feel a little more comfortable with the idea of premium-rate |
32 |
> Gentoo subscriptions once Gentoo's status has been finalised. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> This posting is NOT intended as flamebait. I am just a user. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I love Gentoo, it has taught me SO much in the last year - which seems |
37 |
> to have rushed by so quickly since I've been using Gentoo - and I'd |
38 |
> like all the developers to know that I owe them a debt of thanks for |
39 |
> all their hard work on the project. I'm not particularly competent, and |
40 |
> I don't know that I'll ever be able to contribute to Gentoo in the way |
41 |
> that they have. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> I am sure that any latency on the move towards formal not-for-profit |
44 |
> status is unintentional, and personally I don't think I'd mind if |
45 |
> Gentoo announced it was it was going to become a commercial entity, |
46 |
> because those that have contributed to Gentoo intellectually do deserve |
47 |
> rewarding financially. I really value Gentoo for what it has given me |
48 |
> but I guess I also value Free Software (tm), too, so I guess I'd just |
49 |
> kinda like this cleared up, one way or the other. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Stroller. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
> -- |
55 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
56 |
|
57 |
-- |
58 |
Home -- http://www.brianandsara.net |
59 |
Gentoo -- http://gentoo.brianandsara.net |
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |