Archives
Archives
| From: | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments to [STABLE] bugs | ||
| Date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:11:51 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44DDB6C2.90802@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments to [STABLE] bugs by Chris Gianelloni |
||
| 1 | Being an amd64 dev, I want to basically add a 'me too!' here. I think |
| 2 | it's not necessary to add the --info output when all worked well, |
| 3 | though, if instead the output of -pv $PN was given. Except when there |
| 4 | was a failure reported before, because then we need it to compare the two. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Regarding the inline vs. attachment issue, I'd vote for inline too. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Just my 0.05 CHF, |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Kind Regards, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Simon Stelling |
| 14 | Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments to [STABLE] bugs | "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> |