| 1 |
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:08:50 +0200 |
| 2 |
Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Being an amd64 dev, I want to basically add a 'me too!' here. I think |
| 5 |
> it's not necessary to add the --info output when all worked well, |
| 6 |
> though, if instead the output of -pv $PN was given. Except when there |
| 7 |
> was a failure reported before, because then we need it to compare the |
| 8 |
> two. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Thing is, an AT who reports success before someone else reports a |
| 11 |
failure won't know whether that will happen, and may have moved on |
| 12 |
since the test was performed. So always reporting `emerge info` at |
| 13 |
the time of the report makes sense even for successful tests. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Kevin F. Quinn |
Archives