1 |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:53:43PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:13 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > W dniu pon, 09.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶11 -0500, użytkownik William Hubbs |
5 |
> > napisał: |
6 |
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:43:31PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
7 |
> > > > sys-apps/portage-mgorny has already done that. The defaults locations |
8 |
> > > > have been changed to: |
9 |
> > > > |
10 |
> > > > DISTDIR="/var/cache/portage/distfiles" |
11 |
> > > > PKGDIR="/var/cache/portage/packages" |
12 |
> > > > RPMDIR="/var/cache/portage/rpm" |
13 |
> > > > |
14 |
> > > > Plus repositories are in /var/db/repos/<name>. This is also the layout |
15 |
> > > > used by eselect-repository. |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > I like this idea, but slightly different; I think we should stay out of |
18 |
> > > /var/db. We don't want folks to go messing around in there and nuke |
19 |
> > > /var/db/pkg by mistake. |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Following that reasoning, we shouldn't use /var at all because people |
23 |
> > might 'go messing around in there and nuke /var/* by mistake'. Or any |
24 |
> > directory. Our only hope is Windows where we can create P:\ and not |
25 |
> > worry that people might 'go messing around in there and nuke the system |
26 |
> > by mistake'. |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> |
29 |
> ++ |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Though I do prefer /var/lib or /var/cache over /var/db, simply because |
32 |
> /var/lib is actually in FHS. |
33 |
|
34 |
Agreed, /var/db I guess is a Gentoo invention of some kind? |
35 |
|
36 |
William |