| 1 |
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 16:29 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: |
| 4 |
> >> On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: |
| 6 |
> >>>> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: |
| 7 |
> >>>> |
| 8 |
> >>>>> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide |
| 9 |
> >>>>> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember |
| 10 |
> >>>>> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the |
| 11 |
> >>>>> "package-by-package" proposal for others) |
| 12 |
> >>>>> |
| 13 |
> >>>>> Also, I am not sure if any other arch teams (sparc, ia64?) would want to |
| 14 |
> >>>>> get this policy too :| (I got ppc* because this concrete case ;)) |
| 15 |
> >>>> At first this is an arch team decision. No need for the council. |
| 16 |
> >>>> |
| 17 |
> >>>> (Given that in this case there is a responsive and addressable arch team...) |
| 18 |
> >>>> |
| 19 |
> >>>> -- |
| 20 |
> >>>> |
| 21 |
> >>>> Andreas K. Huettel |
| 22 |
> >>>> Gentoo Linux developer |
| 23 |
> >>>> dilfridge@g.o |
| 24 |
> >>>> http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
| 25 |
> >>>> |
| 26 |
> >>> The problem is that blueness looks to be the only member currently |
| 27 |
> >>> replying :/, I have checked their page and I see no team lead or |
| 28 |
> >>> similar. Then, I am not sure how to get the ok to proceed or not :| (to |
| 29 |
> >>> prevent this from getting stalled and we keep trying stabilizing all the |
| 30 |
> >>> things). |
| 31 |
> >>> |
| 32 |
> >>> I remember from older thread (one related with udev stabilization), that |
| 33 |
> >>> blueness was also the only one replying. |
| 34 |
> >>> |
| 35 |
> >>> |
| 36 |
> >> Yeah, not having a clear lead is a problem. No one wants to just make a |
| 37 |
> >> big decision on behalf of the team without making sure everyone is on |
| 38 |
> >> board. Pacho, do you have access to timberdoodle? If so, join both |
| 39 |
> >> teams and just take the initiative and let any other "claimants" step |
| 40 |
> >> forward now. BTW, taking the lead doesn't mean doing all the work |
| 41 |
> >> yourself. I want to see ppc/ppc64 in good shape. I'll be happy to |
| 42 |
> >> write scripts to do the demoting to ~ etc etc. |
| 43 |
> >> |
| 44 |
> > I don't even know about timberdoodle :( |
| 45 |
> > |
| 46 |
> > I forwarded the mail to both alias (as I forgot first time), then, |
| 47 |
> > hopefully they will review it :/ |
| 48 |
> > |
| 49 |
> > Will CC them again to this just now with this link to allow all to read |
| 50 |
> > the full thread: |
| 51 |
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92151 |
| 52 |
> > |
| 53 |
> > |
| 54 |
> > |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> I think its clear who cares about ppc/ppc64. If there are no |
| 57 |
> objections, I'll take the lead of those teams and see this plan |
| 58 |
> through. I'll wait a few days for people to voice concerns. Then I'll |
| 59 |
> start by generating a list of all stable and testing packages on ppc and |
| 60 |
> ppc64. I'll post then and then continue the conversation on just the |
| 61 |
> ppc and ppc64 lists. Don't worry, I won't start dropping to ~ until we |
| 62 |
> have a concise plan and we're all on board. |
| 63 |
> |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
OK, please feel free to contact me whenever you want. Usually via mail. |
| 66 |
I will have restricted internet access during most August but should be |
| 67 |
ok again in September :) |
Archives