Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists <lists@×××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ?
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:43:01
Message-Id: 200504241543.10663.lists@seattleserver.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ? by Omer Cohen
1 On Friday 22 April 2005 23:26, Omer Cohen wrote:
2 > I've been working with it since it came out.
3 >
4 > And I made big projects with more then a few classes and objects and it all
5 > worked fine, I didn't have any problems with it.
6 > It's not like a group of 100 people from microsoft tested it and said it's
7 > ok, the entire community of PHP developers agreed it's alright and aprooved
8 > it.
9 > we're talking about one of the biggest OC communities.
10 >
11 > I believe it's stable enough to get marked as stable on the portage tree.
12 >
13 > Regarding the remark of not overriding the system, what I ment is that I
14 > there's no reason to manualy unmask a stable product..
15
16 I strongly agree. We actually lost a client recently because we adhere to the
17 stable tree of Gentoo but our PHP was too dated for them (they wanted PHP
18 5.x).
19
20 Cheers,
21 --
22 Casey Allen Shobe | SeattleServer, Inc.
23 cshobe@×××××××××××××.com | cell 425-443-4653
24 http://www.seattleserver.com
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ? Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ? Juergen Hoetzel <gentoo@×××××××.info>