| 1 |
On 03/04/10 17:38, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>: |
| 5 |
>> Agreed, "scm" is a bad choice. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> So it is really tracked in |
| 8 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56967 now. If there is |
| 9 |
> anything to comment do it there. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Is that a good idea? |
| 12 |
Maybe we should restrict the bug to status updates on moving and keep |
| 13 |
discussions on here? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Anyone can start moving the packages |
| 17 |
> over properly to dev-vcs (with profiles/updates entries of course), |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
There seems to be a lot more to it: |
| 20 |
- Updating eclasses? |
| 21 |
- Updating documentation |
| 22 |
- Updating reverse dependencies? |
| 23 |
- Pushing news out to Gentoo users (and developers) |
| 24 |
- Update package names used in Layman (my task) |
| 25 |
- <more here> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
What else can you think of? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Maybe make a new thread "dev-vcs migration roadmap" from here? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Sebastian |
Archives