| 1 |
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:03:18 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" |
| 5 |
| > <nadams@××××.org> |
| 6 |
| > wrote: |
| 7 |
| > | > Because that won't help in the slightest. |
| 8 |
| > | |
| 9 |
| > | So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing |
| 10 |
| > | things by default is bad? Explain? |
| 11 |
| > |
| 12 |
| > No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp |
| 13 |
| > of approval upon bug closures is worthless. |
| 14 |
| |
| 15 |
| So you're problem isn't with the peer review I'm proposing but instead |
| 16 |
| quality of work of the team leads? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Not at all. I'm saying that a) most 'team leads' will not do proper |
| 19 |
checks because they don't have time to and b) the limited time that |
| 20 |
'team leads' have is better spent elsewhere. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 24 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 25 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives