| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
> | > Because that won't help in the slightest. |
| 8 |
> | |
| 9 |
> | So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing things |
| 10 |
> | by default is bad? Explain? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp of |
| 13 |
> approval upon bug closures is worthless. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So you're problem isn't with the peer review I'm proposing but instead |
| 17 |
quality of work of the team leads? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFDBzgm2QTTR4CNEQARAvaCAJwJO5BrCK+yG57+yxa4TI2gN9zT6ACdEjPP |
| 24 |
7S5TQ9d236Oo1Lkln/9QziY= |
| 25 |
=39QI |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives