| 1 |
On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:56:48 +0200 Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
| 3 |
> | > When someone contacts GWN to have |
| 4 |
> | > something corrected, it would be appreciated were the GWN staff to |
| 5 |
> | > at least deign to acknowledge receipt, even if for some reason they |
| 6 |
> | > choose not to honour the corrections or post a retraction (although |
| 7 |
> | > refusing to publish corrections is extremely insulting to those |
| 8 |
> | > wronged). |
| 9 |
> | |
| 10 |
> | The reason for that is that the GWN is mostly sent out by mail. This |
| 11 |
> | makes corrections a bit more difficult, but I think having a sane |
| 12 |
> | policy for that would be helpful. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Publish a 'corrections' section in the next edition? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
and fix the original |
| 17 |
-mike |
Archives