| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> You can do it through bashrc. But then, if this is about working around |
| 3 |
> Portage's annoying lack of sane cross compile handling, why not put a |
| 4 |
> little effort into fixing it properly rather than a lot of effort into |
| 5 |
> making the tree more complicated? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Err, I think you're mixing up different things. How should portage be |
| 8 |
able to do sane cross compiling if you control the instruction sets |
| 9 |
through use flags which are blocked in profiles the build system is |
| 10 |
using? In fact, moving away from use flags over to the real(TM) solution |
| 11 |
is a step towards fixing the issue. Also, it doesn't make the tree more |
| 12 |
complicated. It is far more intuitive that supported instruction sets |
| 13 |
are used if the user doesn't explicitly wish not to than having some |
| 14 |
strange use flags that don't mean what they're named like. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kind Regards, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Simon Stelling |
| 20 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives