Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Bainbridge <chrb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting | ||
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:22:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200407271821.03199.chrb@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 27 July 2004 18:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:54:49 -0400 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o> |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > wrote: |
| 5 | > | 1. Without bug voting, there's no way to determine what bugs are most |
| 6 | > | important to the public (or at least to the people using Bugzilla, |
| 7 | > | which is really *our* public, in a working sense). |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Well, given that most of our users don't seem to be able to get the |
| 10 | > priority field straight ("Waah! There's a tiny typo in an einfo |
| 11 | > statement! BLOCKER!"), |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Insulting the users; constructive! |
| 14 | |
| 15 | > I'd be kind of sceptical about an easily rigged |
| 16 | > popularity contest. I suspect we'd just end up seeing thousands of votes |
| 17 | > for "add more pictures to bootsplash" and "add this horribly broken |
| 18 | > kernel patch to g-d-s"... |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Funny, this doesn't seem to be a problem for kde |
| 21 | (http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=grave&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=crash&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&votes=21&order=bugs.votes) |
| 22 | |
| 23 | -- |
| 24 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |