| 1 |
On 13/06/2022 10.49, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:44 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Judging from the gentoo-dev@ mailing list discussion [1] about EGO_SUM, |
| 6 |
>>> where some voices where in agreement that EGO_SUM has its raison d'être, |
| 7 |
>>> while there where no arguments in favor of eventually removing EGO_SUM, |
| 8 |
>>> I hereby propose to undeprecate EGO_SUM. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> 1: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/1a64a8e7694c3ee11cd48a58a95f2faa |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Can this be done without requesting changes to package managers? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What is 'this' here? The patchset does not make changes to any package |
| 15 |
manager, just the go-module eclass. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Note that this is not about finding about an alternative to dependency |
| 18 |
tarballs. It is just about re-allowing EGO_SUM in addition to dependency |
| 19 |
tarballs for packaging Go software in Gentoo. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- Flow |
Archives