| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 04/03/2013 05:29 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass |
| 8 |
>> already uses that name with epatch. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> base.eclass should have died a horrible death a long time ago. A |
| 11 |
> new EAPI is an excellent opportunity to ban it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That is not possible without the agreement of the eclass maintainers. |
| 15 |
So you cannot just "ban" an eclass. |
| 16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 17 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 18 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRXGGXAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz7DMH/0crt8ANEKsqp6WsB4mAs7Vr |
| 21 |
7g7Q+nGdvsXyfXVaU9o65S7hFANElXUsYYt5pyOliO2bQVKyGxIxKDO5WPdcJfVO |
| 22 |
rEwEtCLAJrrknMa8TlHol7tAkcXCCCFlM0OZYvGJFJPaaOTwq7bRhdqEN2xoGOJy |
| 23 |
xW+aDLuhmS38dxGHiRP8s3BsD/8vuNDDCETOKfbid9SSjoB3HlhzM/4Um5bzsu+y |
| 24 |
XwUQLU+VndcSqa45PHYl8ai9JFxRDmwNSutA7jkzJ2ogksJ1rbZ5bzIUyTxnpyqu |
| 25 |
2qbfcEjD0UQ9OF80p14OJzJdxOzYu9p0ATH37iVXgSvYQdGOle0Y2IUctYd60p0= |
| 26 |
=MnS5 |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives