Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:33:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130403162948.65e37ffa@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? by hasufell |
||
| 1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 | Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200 |
| 5 | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 | > You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass already |
| 7 | > uses that name with epatch. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | base.eclass should have died a horrible death a long time ago. A new |
| 10 | EAPI is an excellent opportunity to ban it. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| 14 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 15 | Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 16 | |
| 17 | iEYEARECAAYFAlFcSu4ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEXTQCgjcw7R3u8xXcsFWiLd85BxAbN |
| 18 | W04AnjlclAx3xLpbXot8TwDmdZxsV3s/ |
| 19 | =wiQJ |
| 20 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? | "Tomáš Chvátal" <tomas.chvatal@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |