Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <tomas.chvatal@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function?
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:56:50
Message-Id: 23953450.kLgeMlCRZ8@arcarius
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Dne St 3. dubna 2013 16:29:48, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200
6 > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 > > You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass already
9 > > uses that name with epatch.
10 >
11 >
12 > base.eclass should have died a horrible death a long time ago. A new
13 > EAPI is an excellent opportunity to ban it.
14 >
15
16 This is actually good idea to ban the base.eclass usage, but wonder how
17 complex it would make all the eclasses that currently inherit it.
18
19 Tom

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>