1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> I think removal of functions is a special case of "Adding and |
4 |
>> Updating Eclasses" and we already have a policy for this. |
5 |
|
6 |
> Removing functions needs a migration plan. For example how long to |
7 |
> have a warning there, how long before it can be removed etc. |
8 |
|
9 |
There may be no general answer to these questions. If it's an eclass |
10 |
with limited scope and if the functions are no longer used in the |
11 |
tree, then I don't see the need for a long transition period. OTOH, |
12 |
for widespread eclasses like eutils you'd probably want it. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I don't see how you can get those from the common policy? |
15 |
|
16 |
"If you don't email gentoo-dev first, and end up breaking something, |
17 |
expect to be in a lot of trouble." |
18 |
|
19 |
Ulrich |