Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:56:58
Message-Id: 4B8F677E.2070502@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 by Ulrich Mueller
1 On 03/04/2010 09:39 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 >>>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
3 >
4 >> If we decide allowing removal of functions, we should come up with a
5 >> common procedure like the eclass removal policy:
6 >> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html
7 >
8 > I think removal of functions is a special case of "Adding and Updating
9 > Eclasses" and we already have a policy for this.
10 >
11 > Ulrich
12 >
13
14 Removing functions needs a migration plan. For example how long to have
15 a warning there, how long before it can be removed etc. I don't see how
16 you can get those from the common policy?
17
18 Regards,
19 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies