Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:39:35
Message-Id: 19343.25505.839827.273840@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 by "Petteri Räty"
1 >>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
2
3 > If we decide allowing removal of functions, we should come up with a
4 > common procedure like the eclass removal policy:
5 > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html
6
7 I think removal of functions is a special case of "Adding and Updating
8 Eclasses" and we already have a policy for this.
9
10 Ulrich

Replies