From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 | ||
Date: | Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:39:35 | ||
Message-Id: | 19343.25505.839827.273840@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 by "Petteri Räty" |
1 | >>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > If we decide allowing removal of functions, we should come up with a |
4 | > common procedure like the eclass removal policy: |
5 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
6 | |
7 | I think removal of functions is a special case of "Adding and Updating |
8 | Eclasses" and we already have a policy for this. |
9 | |
10 | Ulrich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |