| 1 |
Le mardi 02 avril 2013 à 09:43 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:31 +0200 |
| 3 |
> "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn: |
| 6 |
> > > > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf" |
| 7 |
> > > > anywhere. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to non-mDNS/DNS-SD based |
| 10 |
> > > zeroconf like UPnP/SSDP? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > No idea to be honest... :| opinions? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The flags should be practical. I have no use for DNS-SD and other |
| 15 |
> magical junk, yet use UPnP/IGD for port forwarding. The flags should |
| 16 |
> let me just enable just that without pulling all other possible |
| 17 |
> variants I won't use. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> That said, USE=upnp was cleaned up a while ago. I don't think it should |
| 20 |
> be integrated with zeroconf. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yeah I don't think it should be merged into zeroconf even though it |
| 23 |
shares some of its technical base. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Imho, zeroconf == dnssd/mdns & ipv4ll and upnp/upnp-av are as described |
| 26 |
in use.desc |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 30 |
Gentoo |
Archives