1 |
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:27 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: |
2 |
> субота, 10. червень 2006 04:28, Christel Dahlskjaer Ви написали: |
3 |
> > I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and |
4 |
> > future of the GWN at their next meeting. |
5 |
> Hah? What has concil to do with this? Is it going to mandate "GWN be better" |
6 |
> and it magically turns into some other thing? Why do you think there is |
7 |
> malicious intent here at all? |
8 |
|
9 |
I was hoping the council, whom I understand to be built up of people who |
10 |
genuinely care for Gentoo, would look at whether there was any ways of |
11 |
helping the GWN become better. Say, look at alternative ways of |
12 |
recruiting/ attracting contributors. It may have been the wrong place to |
13 |
bring it up, but its the place that was suggested to me when I asked |
14 |
people who have been around a lot longer than I have. |
15 |
|
16 |
> [skipping the listing] |
17 |
> All these problems can be explained very simply - a lack of manpower. As I |
18 |
> understand, GWN now is a one-man endeavour and Ulrich was pointing this out |
19 |
> himself and literally yelling for help! Many many times! Over approx last 6 |
20 |
> month or so.. |
21 |
|
22 |
As Ulrich doesn't reply to my e-mails, I haven't had a chance to discuss |
23 |
with him, I have, however, spoken to Patrick at great length and I |
24 |
understand that the GWN finds it difficult to recruit, or even attract |
25 |
contributors. And I agree, the main problem appears to be manpower, |
26 |
which is why I am hoping that by creating some discussion people may |
27 |
come up with new / different ways of attracting people to the GWN. |
28 |
|
29 |
> Do we want a more reliable and representative GWN? Of course! |
30 |
> How we can get there? Well, stand up and help! Involving council is not going |
31 |
> to do anything besides starting yet another pointless burocratic endeavor. |
32 |
> Well, I suspect it won't do even that - I am pretty sure council is going to |
33 |
> just throw out this "claim" even if you officially start it. They can of |
34 |
> course mandate some more action, but what would be the point? If there are no |
35 |
> people willing to stand up, then who will listen to it? |
36 |
|
37 |
If the council chooses to throw it aside and not look at ways of helping |
38 |
the GWN then well, that sucks. But atleast I tried. |
39 |
|
40 |
> So, to conclude this thing. The only way GWN is going to improve, is if some |
41 |
> more people will "join the ranks" and start writing/editing GWN entries. I'd |
42 |
> say a team of 3 people is usually sufficient, but we need more like 7 so that |
43 |
> three are "available" for more than a first month :) (this is based on my |
44 |
> experience with organazing Russian transation team in its early days), plus a |
45 |
> steady stream of at least one new dev joining/two month, to compensate for |
46 |
> people droppig out. This should also have an effect of draft GWN published at |
47 |
> least a day in advance, instead of a few hours, so that the rest of us will |
48 |
> be able (and will ;)) take a look at it and make corrections.. |
49 |
|
50 |
I agree with the above, and as stated before, I am hoping that the |
51 |
Council, or hell, just discussion on -dev may result in someone jumping |
52 |
up and saying "I have an idea, why don't you..." or "Have you tried.." |
53 |
as what would be great is if people could come up with ideas and ways of |
54 |
attracting people. |