| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:25:30 -0400 |
| 3 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
the cdrecord -scanbus, should preferrably detect ATAPI without having to |
| 7 |
set the "dev=" variable, is what I tried to point out. if it would, it |
| 8 |
would suddenly become usable with all existing frontends. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> The long and the skinny essentially is... Does this "require" |
| 14 |
> ide-scsi or is it something left up to the user? The changes to |
| 15 |
> devfs.d should be the same for either an IDE (using ide-scsi) or |
| 16 |
> SCSI burner. This would of course *not* work with ATAPI burning, |
| 17 |
> unless you set all cdroms to be owned by cdrw, which wouldn't be |
| 18 |
> such a hurtful thing (would it?) at all. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Actually it doesnt, the thing im worried about is the modules.d changes, |
| 22 |
since I cannot test them. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
as for owning, yes, that -is- a problem as it would interfere with the |
| 26 |
cdrom group for users. (a user with cdrw group could mess a user with |
| 27 |
only "cdrom" access over. And cdrom should be enough to do ripping, if |
| 28 |
we chown it to cdrw it won't be. == b0rk. ) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
//Spider |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
begin .signature |
| 37 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 38 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 39 |
end |
Archives