1 |
Dnia 2014-07-08, o godz. 20:52:49 |
2 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 07/08/2014 07:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > I would like to ask the Council to abolish the following policies that |
6 |
> > have been established by the games team: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > 1. that the games team has authority over the actual maintainers |
9 |
> > on every game ebuild, |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > 2. that every ebuild has to inherit games.eclass as the last eclass |
12 |
> > inherited [1], even if it actually increases the ebuild size rather |
13 |
> > than helping, |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > 3. that games must adhere to games team-specific install locations |
16 |
> > and ownership rules, shortly listed in [2]. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Why is Council intervention needed to abolish these policies? They're |
19 |
> not binding. |
20 |
> As far as I know, the games team has no special status so like any other |
21 |
> project they can recommend whatever they want - nobody is obliged to |
22 |
> listen (I certainly don't). |
23 |
|
24 |
The games team believes that they're binding. In fact, I recall one of |
25 |
the team members remarking explicitly that they're going to alter |
26 |
ebuilds that were committed without their approval. |
27 |
|
28 |
In fact, they did remove ebuilds from the tree in the past for this |
29 |
reason [1]. |
30 |
|
31 |
[1]:http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/games-strategy/openxcom/?hideattic=0 |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |