| 1 |
On 03/06/14 15:08, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:35:42 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> This probably could have used a news item, as the change impacts both |
| 6 |
>> stable and ~arch users. |
| 7 |
> Are we going to write a news item every time systemd acquires a new |
| 8 |
> mandatory relationship with a reverse dependency? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
IMHO, not every singular dependency change (even blocker) needs one. |
| 11 |
For those failing to read `eix upower` or `emerge -C upower` or masking |
| 12 |
systemd, or number of other ways the blocker can be solved, the answer |
| 13 |
is in Gentoo news letter, forums, first hits in Google, /topic of #gentoo at |
| 14 |
Freenode, MLs, pretty much everywhere. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
But news item has been planned all along for when UPower 0.99.0 goes |
| 17 |
stable, propably |
| 18 |
GNOME 3.12 and some 0.99.0 consumers, when there are enough steps to |
| 19 |
accumulate as news worthy. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- Samuli |
Archives