1 |
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:29 +0200, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
2 |
> On 4/5/07, Alexandre Buisse <nattfodd@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Well, the thing is, vote happens only once a year, and quite a lot of |
4 |
> > things can be done during that time. I just think that not having any |
5 |
> > rule at all concerning limitations to the council is tying our hands in |
6 |
> > our back. If the council never messes up, then this rule won't ever be |
7 |
> > used, and if they do, we'll be happy to have this handy rather than |
8 |
> > having to argue for ages and being told "you elected us, so shut up |
9 |
> > and if you don't agree, don't vote for us next time" (which is an |
10 |
> > answer I actually got several times). |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Why not simply allow trustees to veto a council decision ? This does |
13 |
> not give trustees enough power to be a second council, but would |
14 |
> permit them to stop something that they believe will damage Gentoo. |
15 |
|
16 |
Actually, while it isn't spelled out, this is likely the case, since the |
17 |
trustees (and the Foundation members, by extension) are the holders of |
18 |
the Gentoo name. The Foundation is what grants the Council its power by |
19 |
"allowing" Gentoo (Linux) to govern itself. |
20 |
|
21 |
Trust me, if the Council were doing something nasty and underhanded that |
22 |
would endanger Gentoo, the trustees would try to do *something* to |
23 |
prevent it. That being said, I don't think that anybody is out to try |
24 |
to harm Gentoo. We (the Council) understand that we cannot appease |
25 |
everybody all the time and don't make any apologies for not being able |
26 |
to do so. |
27 |
|
28 |
> This is very little red tape IMHO. |
29 |
|
30 |
That being said, the Trustees really don't have "jurisdiction" over the |
31 |
Council's technical decisions or their decisions on how to actually run |
32 |
Gentoo. This is a power the trustees could have, but it isn't one they |
33 |
necessarily *do* have. I have no idea if they would even want it and my |
34 |
opinion doesn't matter a whole lot, since I would be in conflict of |
35 |
interest in pretty much any decision. |
36 |
|
37 |
> If it's only stupid and not harmful it will be solved naturally with |
38 |
> the current structure by waiting for the next elections (either at the |
39 |
> end of the term or because enough council members resigned due to the |
40 |
> situation). |
41 |
|
42 |
There's a huge difference between the Council doing something against |
43 |
Gentoo and the Council doing something certain people don't agree with. |
44 |
The former is completely intolerable while the latter is very likely to |
45 |
happen with any decision the Council makes. Some people will always |
46 |
spout off conspiracy theories and their opinions on how they think |
47 |
things should be, which is all fine and dandy except that it isn't how |
48 |
things *are* currently. If someone wants something changed, they can |
49 |
very well work to get it changed. Trying to force the Council to do |
50 |
something via underhanded tactics or baseless accusations doesn't do |
51 |
much. Getting the community together does. |
52 |
|
53 |
If the community decided that the Council is only allowed to hold |
54 |
meetings on Thursday when the moon is full, we'd abide by it. |
55 |
|
56 |
I just find this whole situation hysterical since you have so many |
57 |
people saying the Council needs to "grow a pair" and actually try to |
58 |
enact some good, and when we do, you hear a few vocal individuals |
59 |
running around screaming like we killed their kitten. So which is it? |
60 |
Would you rather have a strong Council that is capable of making |
61 |
decisions without having to worry about whether that decision is popular |
62 |
or not, or would you rather have a weak Council that cannot do anything |
63 |
without prior developer approval, completely castrating their abilities |
64 |
to enact change for fear of being removed from office? |
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
Chris Gianelloni |
68 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
69 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
70 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
71 |
Gentoo Foundation |