| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:17:22AM -0500 or thereabouts, Brett Simpson wrote: |
| 2 |
> How about an additional set of rights for enterprise/stable ebuilds in the |
| 3 |
> current tree? If committer xyz doesn't have rights to the ebuild then they |
| 4 |
> can't delete it. Of course they can always make a new non enterprise/stable |
| 5 |
> ebuilds for the regular tree. |
| 6 |
> Then the issue comes up is what if the committer makes an unauthorized |
| 7 |
> enterprise/stable ebuild? One solution would be to have portage check the |
| 8 |
> rights on the ebuild. If it doesn't have the additional set of rights then |
| 9 |
> it's not an enterprise ebuild and it won't install. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
These are all good suggestions and I think that the stable tree (if |
| 12 |
approved) will end up incorporating many of them down the road. However, |
| 13 |
the GLEP as it currently stands is mainly focused on establishing the base |
| 14 |
tree itself. I consider this a pre-requisite to all of the other |
| 15 |
suggestions that have been made. These suggestions are also better |
| 16 |
answered/implemented by the folks working on the QA project. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So, basically, I want to walk before we run. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
--kurt |
Archives